Wednesday, 2025-07-09, 10:53 AM
Welcome Guest | RSS
[TheD]The Descendants
Main | Weird thoughts - Page 12 - Forum | Registration | Login
[ New messages · Members · Forum rules · Search · RSS ]
Forum moderator: h@†3, MrTiny  
Weird thoughts
TuralyonDate: Wednesday, 2009-10-21, 8:35 PM | Message # 166
Major
Group: Clan Friends
Messages: 241
Reputation: 4
Status: Offline
Comment removed by author.

Your resoning is excellent -- it's only your basic asumptions that are wrong.

Message edited by Turalyon - Thursday, 2009-10-22, 10:05 PM
 
DissociactiveDate: Wednesday, 2009-10-21, 8:41 PM | Message # 167
Colonel
Group: Member
Messages: 107
Reputation: 2
Status: Offline
Another math mystery? cool
 
TuralyonDate: Thursday, 2009-10-22, 6:02 PM | Message # 168
Major
Group: Clan Friends
Messages: 241
Reputation: 4
Status: Offline
Naa, just being bored and thinking of random stuff.

Your resoning is excellent -- it's only your basic asumptions that are wrong.
 
HakkenDate: Sunday, 2009-11-01, 6:13 PM | Message # 169
Colonel
Group: Member
Messages: 155
Reputation: 3
Status: Offline
Onothr math mystery from HELL.
if 2+2=4, and 2*2=4, does it mean that 2=2?! biggrin


There are just 10 types of pealpe. Thoose who understands binary and thoose who don't.
 
TuralyonDate: Monday, 2009-11-02, 8:32 PM | Message # 170
Major
Group: Clan Friends
Messages: 241
Reputation: 4
Status: Offline
If you say that there exists a Natural number 0, which is the lowest Natural number and a type "(+)" which means "next number" or "add 1".
And if you say that it's not true that 0=x(+)
and that if you use a Natural number x whereas 0+x=x and x(+)+y = (x+y)(+) and that x*0=0 with x(+)*y=(x*y)+y
Than you can say that it's not true that 0=0(+).
And it also means that for any (+) we get the point that 0(+) is not the same as 0(+)(+)

And to say that 0(+)(+) = 2, you can do only if you say 0(+)=1 and 1(+)=2.
So you can get to the point where you say that (0(+)+0(+)(+))(+) = 0(+)(+)(+)(+), and you get the point that (0(+)(+))(+)(+) = 0(+)(+)(+)(+)
So you can say that 0(+)(+)+0(+)(+)=0(+)(+)(+)(+), where it means that 0(+)(+)=2, and 2(+)(+)=4 ... so you get that 0(+)(+)(+)(+)=4.
So you got to the point where 2+2=4.
You do the same with 2*2=4.

And if you prove the other one with the same way, you can say that 0(+)(+) = 0(+)(+), in other words, 2=2.


Your resoning is excellent -- it's only your basic asumptions that are wrong.
 
JilakoDate: Tuesday, 2009-11-03, 8:49 AM | Message # 171
Lieutenant
Group: Clan Friends
Messages: 143
Reputation: 9
Status: Offline
*speak to brain* Haa, my apologies for having bring you there, i promise not to bring you there anymore , poor brain
*go heal his brain*


What am I , Who am I except a ghost from old times?
 
MrTinyDate: Tuesday, 2009-11-03, 1:31 PM | Message # 172
Clanleader
Group: Administrators
Messages: 1145
Reputation: 28
Status: Offline
rofl

Born In Darkness. Sworn To Justice.
Experience is simply the name we give our mistakes.
 
TuralyonDate: Tuesday, 2009-11-03, 7:48 PM | Message # 173
Major
Group: Clan Friends
Messages: 241
Reputation: 4
Status: Offline
I said something wrong? Oo

Your resoning is excellent -- it's only your basic asumptions that are wrong.
 
MrTinyDate: Tuesday, 2009-11-03, 10:16 PM | Message # 174
Clanleader
Group: Administrators
Messages: 1145
Reputation: 28
Status: Offline
Nay, u just made Orcs brain explod :O

Born In Darkness. Sworn To Justice.
Experience is simply the name we give our mistakes.
 
MightyMalcolmDate: Tuesday, 2009-11-03, 11:05 PM | Message # 175
Sergeant
Group: Clan Friends
Messages: 93
Reputation: 3
Status: Offline
Quote (Turalyon)
x(+)+y = (x+y)(+)

wouldn't that mean x*(+)+y? and u could hardly do any more with it.

Quote (Turalyon)
(0(+)+0(+)(+))(+)
must that be "translated" like (1+2)*(+) <----- what das the last (+) stand for in this case? (1+2)(+)=(3)+1=4?


Applause from the audience, please!

Message edited by MightyMalcolm - Tuesday, 2009-11-03, 11:10 PM
 
AnimalDate: Wednesday, 2009-11-04, 2:38 AM | Message # 176
Sergeant
Group: Clan Friends
Messages: 58
Reputation: 4
Status: Offline
Quote (MightyMalcolm)
Quote (Turalyon)
x(+)+y = (x+y)(+)

wouldn't that mean x*(+)+y? and u could hardly do any more with it.

x(+) ---> (x+1)
x(+)+y ---> (x+1)+y = x+1+y = (x+y)+1
(x+y)(+) ---> (x+y)+1 *points at the end of the line above*

I never saw that operator "(+)" before, but as i see it, x*(+) can't exist, since there is no number/variable to increment.

 
ZorockDate: Wednesday, 2009-11-04, 9:55 AM | Message # 177
Major general
Group: Moderators
Messages: 537
Reputation: 11
Status: Offline
Quote (Animal)
as i see it, x*(+) can't exist, since there is no number/variable to increment.

x*(+) I think that in this case the (+) could refer to x.. which would make it = x*(x+1)


Those who underestimates themselves shall stay in misery where they belong.

Steam ID: dragon_of_doom

 
AnimalDate: Wednesday, 2009-11-04, 1:22 PM | Message # 178
Sergeant
Group: Clan Friends
Messages: 58
Reputation: 4
Status: Offline
When (+) refers to x, x has to stand next to it: x*x(+). If there is no x, it does not refer to x.
Maths is simple sometimes^^
oh, btw
Quote (MightyMalcolm)
Quote (Turalyon)
(0(+)+0(+)(+))(+)
must that be "translated" like (1+2)*(+) <----- what das the last (+) stand for in this case? (1+2)(+)=(3)+1=4?

it is just ( (0+1)+((0+1)+1) ) +1, or simplified (1+2)+1

(+) in this case stands for

Quote (Turalyon)
"next number" or "add 1"


Message edited by Animal - Wednesday, 2009-11-04, 1:22 PM
 
TuralyonDate: Wednesday, 2009-11-04, 3:00 PM | Message # 179
Major
Group: Clan Friends
Messages: 241
Reputation: 4
Status: Offline
It's like this ... if I'd use the operator * I would notify it, same for + ... but as for (+), it stands for ' or + but since + is an operator, I modified it into (+) which means +1. I could use x' instead of x(+), might've been easier.
And as for what I've wrote ... it's true that some things are simplified with 1 and 2 and that with adding all the (+) with the double () ... but I've never defined if 0(+) is same as (0+1) ... I only said it means "next number" ... I actually skipped 9 steps there ... I would write them all, but I think the message would be too long to send. I tried to simply it as best as I could, and yes, it's correct.


Your resoning is excellent -- it's only your basic asumptions that are wrong.
 
MrTinyDate: Saturday, 2009-11-07, 6:03 PM | Message # 180
Clanleader
Group: Administrators
Messages: 1145
Reputation: 28
Status: Offline
thats a "shortened" verson?!? O.O

Born In Darkness. Sworn To Justice.
Experience is simply the name we give our mistakes.
 
Search:

Copyright TheD.Clan© 2025